Dead Man's Folly

First Published: 1956
Setting: Devon

Starring: Hercule Poirot, Mrs. Oliver, Amy Folliat, Sir George Stubbs, Hattie

Important Other People: Amanda Brewis, Michael Weyman, Alec and Peggy Legge, Marlene Tucker, Merdell

The setup for the plot is awesome. First of all, by fete, I assume they mean carnival, which is fun. I also like the idea of the Murder Hunt, even though the results are tragic. I don't quite get how someone could have influenced Mrs. Oliver without her realizing it. I feel like she would have been able to figure out who was trying to manipulate her. It's like in that episode of The Office where Michael spreads a bunch of rumors, and everyone gets together and figures out that he was the source of them all. It just seems a bit unrealistic that she was unable to at least have an idea of who was manipulating her. Also, if someone really wanted to kill Marlene, there probably could have been an easier way for that to happen than by a small chance that she might be the victim in the Murder Hunt.


Anyway, another aspect that bothers me is that, a lot of the time, some characters know some information, but (aside from the murderer) one person never really knows everything (except The Hollow, where everyone knows everything, and Elephants Can Remember, but that will come later). Here, though, Amy Folliat knows everything and is just so unhelpful to Poirot. You'd think she would want to help a little bit because she loves some of the people that were killed, but she just wants to shut everything out and pretend things are not happening. She makes me mad. 


There are also a ton of red herrings and just overall confusing things happening that obscure the real problems. I guess this happens often with Agatha, just some of the ones in this book bother me. The boy in the turtle shirt, for example. 

Interesting facts: Hastings is mentioned. It's been awhile since he's been in a book. The house in the book, Nasse House, is modeled after Agatha's house in Devon, the Greenway Estate. It was her favorite residence.

Favorite? Not too bad. I like the idea of it, but not a lot of the characters.

Death by: strangulation, drowning, unknown

Body Count: 3; Cumulative: 131

The Count: Poirot-26, Miss Marple-6, Tommy and Tuppence-2, Hastings-7, Japp-7, Colonel Race-4, Superintendent Battle-5, George-6, Goby-2, No Recurring Character- 6, Mrs. Oliver-3, Albert- 2, Superintendent Spence-1, Miss Lemon-2

Agatha's Life Lessons: However large and beautiful the flowers, if the earthly roots are destroyed, there will be no more flowers. So much depends on how you look at a thing. Girls don't mind what their mothers say to them. Most men can look after themselves, or ought to be able to. Women tell a lot of lies. Without quarrels and reconciliations, life would be drab. 

Up Next: 4:50 from Paddington

Mrs. McGinty's Dead

First Published: 1952
Setting: Broadhinny

Starring: Hercule Poirot, Mrs. Oliver, Superintendent Spence, Mrs. McGinty (only important because the whole book is about her).

Important Other People: Maureen and Johnnie Summerhayes, James Bentley, Eve and Guy Carpenter, Laura and Robin Upwards, the Wetherby's, the Rendell's, Deidre Henderson, Mrs. Sweetimen

This novel is unique because, as Poirot says, usually the personality of the murdered is the most important aspect of the case. Seeing as Mrs. McGinty was just an ordinary charwoman (and thus not good enough to be important, apparently), the personality of the murderer is what is important in this book. There are a lot of different personalities Poirot has to sort through until he finds one that fits with the crime. 

There are a lot of red herrings in this book, as well as people that you think must be important, but actually aren't. It reminds me of The Murder at the Vicarage, where there were a lot of different characters who eventually were revealed to all have some part in the events surrounding the murder, so I guess that's what I expected here. There are so many characters, and they seem so mysterious that I assume they must be important. It turns out that almost none of them are, they just have silly little things they don't want Poirot to find out about (other than murder). Anyways, ordinary charwoman, extraordinary murderer... less than extraordinary book.

Interesting facts: This is one of the few books where someone actually tries to murder Monsieur Hercule Poirot! This is the only the second appearance of Poirot working with Mrs. Oliver, the first being Cards on the Table. Hastings, Shaitana from Cards on the Table, and Battle are all mentioned, although none make appearances (especially since Shaitana is dead). Apparently, this novel was written after Agatha had recently collaborated with producer Peter Saunders on The Mousetrap, and she had a few frustrations with the process. Mrs. Oliver was used to vent those frustrations, as she says, "You've no idea of the agony of having your characters taken and made to say things they never would have said, and do things that they never would have done. And if you protest, all they say is that it's 'good theatre.'" 

Favorite? No, although Hercule is, of course, ingenious in his deductions. I just always want the plot to be better somehow. 

Death by: cosh on the head, strangulation

Body Count: 2; Cumulative: 115

The Count: Poirot-23, Miss. Marple-4, Tommy and Tuppence-2, Hastings-7, Japp-7, Colonel Race-4, Superintendent Battle-5, George-3, Goby-1, No Recurring Character- 6, Mrs. Oliver-2, Albert- 2, Superintendent Spence-1

Agatha's Life Lessons: You can't get away from heredity- it's in people as well as in dogs. Power must only be used for the right ends. Life is very unfair- some people never seem to get any happiness. If everyone thinks you know a thing, no one will tell you about it. Acute fear always produces the truth. Everyone has something to hide. Success is on the side of the big mustaches. 

Up Next: Murder with Mirrors

Cards on the Table

First Published: 1936

Setting: London

Starring: Hercule Poirot, Mrs. Oliver, Battle, Colonel Race (the Sleuths)

Important Other People: Mr. Shaitana. Dr. Roberts, Mrs. Lorrimer, Major Despard, Anne Meredith (The "Murderers")

The plot for Cards on the Table was laid out by Poirot in The ABC Murders. It truly is a crime that Poirot has ordered to test himself. The important aspect is that there are only 4 suspects, and there is no way to figure out who did it except by Poirot using his little grey cells. It is the supreme psychological crime.

We are introduced to Mrs Oliver- the epitome of Agatha herself. One of Mrs. Oliver's books, The Body in the Library, is mentioned by one of the characters, a book that was eventually written by Christie herself. I like Mrs. Oliver a lot and I always enjoy reading about her, and it's mainly because Christie is clearly parodying herself. She describes the clothes Mrs. Oliver wears, her crazy hairstyles and hats, and mocks herself on her "women's intuition" that she uses to "solve" the crimes she comes into contact with. She guesses everyone in turn, which we see as Christie mocking herself for doing the same thing.

One thing that is interesting- one of the characters says that people tend to stick to arsenic for murders, yet Agatha had not written of any murders committed with arsenic up to this point in her writing career (in her novels).

Hercule Poirot has a thoroughly bourgeois attitude towards murder. He doesn't deal with the lower classes and their problems and murders. The one case that sticks out to me as having a lower-class feel is Mrs. McGinty's Dead, being that she's a charwoman, but the other characters involved are upper-class. Murder has become more common nowadays, making it difficult to find a parallel from the early to mid 20th century.

One of my biggest problems with the book is the importance Poirot places on the bridge scores kept by the suspects. Mainly because I don't know how to play bridge, I don't know the rules or terms, and I basically don't understand any part of what's going on with bridge. It's difficult to truly appreciate the importance of the scores, or to even understand what Poirot deduces based off of them, if you don't understand bridge. I feel like more people in 1936 played bridge and understood it. I always feel like it's something I need to learn just to understand this book better. We'll see if that happens...

Interesting facts: Japp is mentioned. This is a crime to order for Poirot's little grey cells. We see Rhoda and Despard many books later in The Pale Horse. Poirot reveals the true solution to the Orient Express to another character, which could ruin the book if you had never read it before.

Favorite? Of Poirot, YES. Of Agatha, I think it's up there because she always wanted to write it for Poirot to solve. For me, after I've read it a few times, I've liked it better. I hated it the first time I read it because I thought it was so unexciting and the bridge part made no sense to me.

Death by: Stabbing, Veronal/evipan, drowning

Body Count: 3; Cumulative: 46

The Count: Poirot-13, Miss. Marple-1, Tommy and Tuppence-1, Hastings-6, Japp-6, Colonel Race-2, Superintendent Battle-3, George-1, Goby-1, No Recurring Character- 2, Mrs. Oliver-1

Agatha's Life Lessons: A murderer can be an artist, but he's still a murderer. Man is an unoriginal animal. What can't be cured must be endured. There's nothing like death for bringing out the meanness of human nature. One ought to live frightfully dangerously- if one gets the chance. Life, on the whole, is terribly tame. Men don't do purely disinterested kindnesses. The moment a man's a bad lot, all the girls stick up for him. Things are just the same whether you talk about them or not. Life is a difficult business- it needs infinite courage and a lot of endurance. Men always do take fancies to unsuitable women. Lying is not always a sign of guilt. No one can always be right (not even Poirot!)

Up Next: Poirot Loses a Client